View Single Post
Old 01-22-2013, 06:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
Sven7
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by plasticuser View Post
Didn't the car industry try these in the 30s, then abandon them because they'd act like a sail in cross-winds and cause horrible instability?

The second thought I had was, when looking at the photo, the fairing goes below the rim line, which means in a tire failure situation, that fairing is toast.

I'm not trying to rain on anyone's parade, or give 'lessons from history' - just putting this here for completeness of the thread.
I see what you mean- it would have a higher drag coefficient in side winds than a normal car. The 1948 TASCO prototype (begun by Virgil Exner) would have had the same problem-


TASCO TASCO TASCO TASCO!!!!!!!! by Tyler Linner, on Flickr

And yes, I believe they call it a "scrub line". Measure 1/4-1/2" below the rim and anything above that line will be ruined on the first flat tire.

Quote:
Originally Posted by COcyclist View Post
And the original Tucker design too.


Anyway... I like pictures
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sven7 For This Useful Post:
COcyclist (01-23-2013)