Thread: Reverse Trike
View Single Post
Old 02-05-2013, 09:12 AM   #23 (permalink)
NeilBlanchard
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Please read the Riley page on 3 wheel dynamics that the OP linked to. (I first saw that page about 6 years ago.) The Cg is absolutely critical on a 3 wheel design - if it is too far back and/or too high up for all driving conditions, then they will be unstable.

As you mention in point #3, a reverse trike has the potential to greatly improve the aerodynamics, with the sides tapering in - which by the way would also improve the Cg as well as the Cd. But, a 4 wheeled design can also have a narrowing taper (see Dave Cloud's Dolphin) but avoid the stability challenge.

The Dolphin does weigh a lot - it carrying a ton (almost literally) of lead acid batteries and the structure to support it. But if you put a lithium pack in it with the same capacity, it would weigh about 1,500 less. The Dolphin chassis without the batteries is about 1,200 pounds, which is probably similar to the CR-X trike in this thread with it's engine in place.

The Dolphin is also one of the lowest aerodynamic drag cars I know of. It is also one of the most efficient cars that I know of; despite it's weight. If you build a trike, but do not take full advantage of the format, and/or you don't avoid the pitfalls of the layout, then why do it?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 02-05-2013 at 09:26 AM..
  Reply With Quote