That argument would be a stinging repost...
...except for 2 things. Firstly they are discussing scientists discussing something else (the guy quoted is an acknowledged expert in his field)
...and you quoted Skeptical Science a few pages ago - that's a blog (of sorts)
run by a cartoonist using Australian taxpayer's money.
This guy is a professor, he writes interesting stuff
on a blog.
G Cornelis van Kooten | Resource Economics & Policy Analysis (REPA) Group
Scientists blogging ? What a great idea.
Look they all seem to, here's
James Annan.
Oh noes - there's loads of them
here.
Outreach by scientists is a good thing, no ?
EDIT -
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
The 97% is not from a survey. It is an analysis of all the scientific papers.
|
If you are referring to the Oreskes paper then no she didn't do that bit I've highlighted, a correction was published to this effect.
EDIT2 - A Scientist,
writing a blog, about consensus. Whats not to like ? She worked on BEST too
