View Single Post
Old 02-13-2013, 10:34 PM   #50 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,457

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by razor02097 View Post
Unless your vehicle pulls timing when you use lower octane fuel you will not benefit from using a higher octane. Period. If the engine runs with full advance on 87 octane, using higher octane fuel will make zero difference.
I have an UG and have it setup to show the timing advance. How do I know if it's at full advance?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firestone66 View Post
The bare bone results I received on my 500km rides were this. Regular 87, 74 liters equally $74 at a controlled speed of 95km/h... Midgrade 89, 59 liters equally $62 at a controlled speed of 105km/h. That being said I saved twelve loonies and got to where I wanted to get, sooner... Spend more to save more...
There is zero chance that going faster, regardless of octane, results in better fuel economy unless your truck shifts to a lower gear between 95kph and 105kph.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (02-14-2013)