View Single Post
Old 02-20-2013, 08:39 AM   #2 (permalink)
razor02097
Master EcoModder
 
razor02097's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ohio
Posts: 306

Tetanus - '95 Geo Tracker 4WD Base
90 day: 29.43 mpg (US)

300 - '82 Suzuki GS300 L
Last 3: 60.78 mpg (US)

Jeep - '98 Jeep XJ Cherokee Limited
90 day: 12.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
Larger bikes weigh more which can take away their power advantage (in reference to fuel economy). If there was one thing I would never do is P&G a motorcycle. During a long glide you can't really shift to neutral in a sequential transmission and holding the clutch will wear components quickly. Bump starting the engine can be dangerous if you pop the clutch on a slick spot.

Smaller bikes are way more efficient at lower speeds. Larger bikes are typically more efficient than smaller bikes at higher speeds. A rider needs to size the engine of his/her bike to the kind of riding they plan to do. If it's all city, low speed and stop and go a small scooter or motorcycle would suit better than a heavy big bike since the small bike would be lighter, nimble, and use less fuel during idle. If there is a lot of high speed interstate travel a larger bike would suit better since they have the power to maintain the speed, are more comfortable cruising and have a larger capacity fuel tank for extended range.
__________________



Project Avalon: E bike build
  Reply With Quote