View Single Post
Old 02-22-2013, 03:54 AM   #30 (permalink)
wmjinman
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612

Jimmy - '00 GMC Jimmy SLT
90 day: 21.18 mpg (US)

The White Gnat - '99 Suzuki Swift
Team Suzuki
90 day: 51.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varn View Post
I really can not appreciate "Hot Rod" as a source of first party aerodynamic theory.
I mentioned it once before on another thread here, but we independently tested a couple of the suggestions from that article (lowering front, back, and total, and the massive verticle air dam), not wholeheartedly believing all of it initially, either. But as best as we could tell, it all seemed to be true (doing what they said DID improve coastdown times on our car).

They mentioned these things applying to "musclecars", and the car we were using (1971 Buick Riviera) was more that shape, too. So things might be a bit different with the later model cars that are designed with more emphasis on aerodynamics. But, as applied to "pre-aero" cars, I'm satisfied the article is right.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wmjinman For This Useful Post:
darcane (02-22-2013)