View Single Post
Old 02-22-2013, 04:07 AM   #14 (permalink)
ciderbarrel
MPG is not linear police
 
ciderbarrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 121

Ciderbarrel's P*2 - '22 Polestar 2
90 day: 108.13 mpg (US)

Ciderbarrel's Civic - '08 Honda Civic LX
Team Honda
90 day: 31.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
The # of cylinders has an important role in other matters, such as the R/L ratio, power and torque curves, and also weight-saving reasons. We can also take into account the energy expenses required to produce an engine, which are lower when there are less raw materials to be processed and less moving parts to be machined




Actually, from what I've seen in practical with engines from different displacement ranges, bigger cylinders in a smaller # usually lead to lower revving bands, altough a broader torque curve is easier to sustain, while smaller cylinders in a bigger amount usually lead to higher revving and more power, altough any eventual increasement in torque doesn't have the same proportion as the power increasements, plus getting more concentrated in higher RPMs.
That does make sense to me esp in motorcycle terms. My 250 Ninja (parallel twin) was really high revving, but my old 03 1700 Warrior (v-twin) was very low revving. I don't think I ever took it over 3500 rpm
__________________


  Reply With Quote