View Single Post
Old 03-08-2013, 02:16 PM   #544 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
And that money could have paid for a nice, clean nuclear plant which would occupy about 9 square miles (3x3) somewhere remote next to the sea, and it would be reliable.
Sure, if you can figure out how to shut up the anti-nuclear hysterics long enough to get it built - and not have them shut it down in response to tsunami damage to a plant half a world away.

Quote:
Our air has been nice and clean since the clean air act of the 1950s - no more London Pea-Souper fogs. It also extends to power plants so our air has been pretty good.
I beg to differ. Better than in the 1950s, sure, but it's still not all that great, per random nose tests between 1990-2003.

Quote:
Oh dear, you are about 30 years late on that one James old bean. More research needed.
Oh, and you think they won't be back, when/if you give them the chance?