View Single Post
Old 04-06-2013, 10:18 AM   #4 (permalink)
Vekke
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,272

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 841 Times in 414 Posts
There is also "optimal" piston/cylinder size so its not wise to build small piston V8 engines because you cannot get so good efficiency small v8 as using with correct size pistons.

Also as people already mentioned more parts mean heavier engine and also more expensive engine. OEM try to cut the manufacturings costs anyway they can. Its cheaper to produce big 4 + cylinder engine without turbo than 3 banger with one (two or even three) turbo (s).

However that 3 cylinder is 20+30% lighter and gives better efficiency so fuel consumption is the last choosing point to downsizing from V8 to smaller engines.

Also that 3 banger breaks down faster so its easier to sell new car or new engine after the warranty is run out when that engine fails. that is not fun for the customer but good business for OEMs if everyone is doing it.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote