View Single Post
Old 04-08-2013, 08:23 AM   #26 (permalink)
320touring
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,434

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 95 Times in 79 Posts
as stated before, less cyls=

lower manufacturing cost

Less energy Loss (friction and surface area for head dissipation)

Better torque for the same capacity (e.g my dad's 2.0 4pot Avensis has more torque than my 6pot 320i)

better/easier packaging (less engine bay space required)



however, gimme a small capacity v6/straight 6 or v8 over a 4pot any day- the noise is just sublime!

building a car as a saleable tool= fewest cyls possible to meet design critera

building it as an engaging, dynamic and emotive "desirable" object, then more cyls and better sounds please!
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote