View Single Post
Old 04-08-2013, 11:00 AM   #30 (permalink)
razor02097
Master EcoModder
 
razor02097's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ohio
Posts: 306

Tetanus - '95 Geo Tracker 4WD Base
90 day: 29.43 mpg (US)

300 - '82 Suzuki GS300 L
Last 3: 60.78 mpg (US)

Jeep - '98 Jeep XJ Cherokee Limited
90 day: 12.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
I know everyone will have already addressed the issues of thermal efficiency, friction etc. But there's a really simple one:

Cost. More cylinders means more tooling, more weight, more fasteners, more work to make the engine. If you're building an economy car, there's already next to no profit margin in it. If you can screw together the engine with fewer parts, less tooling, fewer workers, do that.
Actually if they can shoehorn in an existing engine and transmission assembly available from another platform it will save them more money than trying to tool up for a basic engine build. Even if it costs a little bit more per unit to physically build it will cost a lot less if there is a larger run (quantity of engines built in a given period of time). Simply put in manufacturing more units = less cost per unit. Which is why you often find the same basic engine in several different vehicles. Sure marketing, decals and engine covers will vary but the heart is the same.
__________________



Project Avalon: E bike build
  Reply With Quote