View Single Post
Old 04-11-2013, 03:16 PM   #8 (permalink)
Diesel_Dave
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mort View Post
Hi Diesel_Dave,
See here.
The EPA temperature adjustment for tire rolling resistance:

So tire RR decreases about 22% at 0 compared to 68 degrees F. Which is going the wrong direction. The largest contributor to RR in modern tires is the stiffness in the steel belts, and that is almost unchanged for the range of temps that a tire sees. The change in the flexibility of the rubber at low temps is likely unimportant. In fact, as the rubber gets stiffer it flexes less so it should roll easier. I'd look at the viscosity of bearing and gear greases as the main culprit.
-mort
So that means they assume it's linear and the RR increases 1% for every 3 deg F you drop from 68 deg F.

That seems ballpark reasonable. Several flolks around here have a rule of thumb for FE vs. temp which is ~1% FE change per 2 deg F change. I think if you calculate air density changes you can ascribe ~1/2 that to aero.

This paper from '77 does talk about the changes to the rubber hysteresis, however, they don't give much data (see page 8):
http://www.edccorp.com/library/TechRefPdfs/EDC-1038.pdf


I also found a reference to an SAE paper from '80, but haven't found the full text yet:
http://papers.sae.org/800090/
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote