View Single Post
Old 04-11-2013, 10:32 PM   #711 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
Cough.



Note the captions - reconstructed vs observed.

Jeebus sliced.
So what exactly is the problem with using the data that's available today to reconstruct the past? I mean, that's basically the whole of archeology & paleontology, isn't it? Not to mention geology, parts of astronomy, &c.

Note that there is part of the graph where the reconstruction and observed data overlap, and they match fairly well. Are you suggesting that whoever did this research just made things up? Or are you just knee-jerking because it's telling you something you don't want to acknowledge?