View Single Post
Old 04-24-2013, 11:48 AM   #767 (permalink)
Arragonis
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
The Marcot et al is "not robust" (their words at RealClimate) so that "scary" ski jump graph is invalid, this obviously hasn't penetrated Climate (lack of) Progress yet.

PAGES2k seems to recycle a lot of papers which have been challenged, junked, and even in one case withdrawn due to major error (Gergis et al 2012). (EDIT - retraction notice here).



If I was in someway suspicious of some scientists I could potentially think that it was made up to get these dead papers into the next IPCC report - not that they would do that of course, unlike before.

Did you notice this one from Antarctica ? Not so scary either.



Or this one on lower sensitivity again ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]