View Single Post
Old 05-09-2013, 08:12 AM   #15 (permalink)
Vekke
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,248

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 814 Times in 399 Posts
0-62 relates only in that way if you think its appropriate use that to tell car is fast rather than top speed. I think the top speed gives better impression about what kind of car the lupo actually is.

Drag equation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So Fd=0.5xair thicknessxVxVxCdxA

I used 25 celsius thickness

Stock lupo GTI at 205 km/h= 0.5x1,184x56,9x56,9x0,34x2,00=1303
Lupo 2L at 266 km/h=0,5x1,184x72,2x72,2x0,375 (lupo 2L CdxA)=1157

GTI has 5 hp more but that will go to conquer higher frictions of the GTI than my lupo 2l.

Lupo 2L drag force @266 km/h should be lower than GTIs @ 205 km/h so what formula do you think I should use to get better results?

I get same power estimations with ecomodder fuel consumption calculator so I believe my calculations are correct.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote