It seams that I never made a thread about my 2013 Honda PCX150 here even though I have been bragging about it on other forums. Needless to say it is great on gas. And not just with hypermilers. check out fuelly where most "normal people" still break 90 mpgUS.
.
Honda PCX MPG Reports | Fuelly
.
I will copy some previous posts.
.
I rode my new PCX150 around some tonight and I am very happy with it. I normally ride my CBR250R which is a great high speed minimal touring bike but I also wanted a super light automatic to teach people how to ride on and the zero down financing made it easy for them to hook me again.
.
Have you ever noticed how when you switch bikes, it is easy to pick out the things the new bike doesn't do as well as the first bike? Well I'm not noticing too much wrong with the PCX. It is pretty dialed in all in all, especially the PCX150 which is quite a bit quicker than the 125 I rode last week. I'm glad I spent the extra $400 to get the benefit of the improvements that Honda incorporated after only one year. I also think the seat slants you forward less on the new model. I may not even end up modding it much. It is that much faster up the hills than the 125.
.
I like the riding experience. There is a strange freedom from thought riding a low powered, super light automatic. Floor it and follow the road. Simple. Relaxing. No decisions about what gear to use or how fast to go because you often going about as fast as it can go. I have heard mountain bikers say the same thing after switching to a single speed. Just pedal.
.
Below 10 mph the small wheels are a bit too quick to turn in but once up to speed the PCX feels very well balanced. No head shake or wobs coming back down the giant hill at 60 mph that I just went up at 51. The combined brakes stop nice and even, and it even looks cool enough that people don't automatically dismiss it as a scooter. It is so light and easy, I could flip the keys to any novice in the parking lot and they would never drop it. The PCX150 is a really good compromise of price, size, and performance.
.
.
.
.