View Single Post
Old 05-20-2013, 06:14 AM   #23 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
This whole conversation took place HERE.
Interesting, thank you for providing the link.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
Attached flow is NOT the goal, it is a characteristic that must be present in order to optimize the Cd. The goal is to eliminate drastic pressure changes, allowing the air to build in behind a vehicle as gently as possible creating as little turbulence as possible.
An important goal indeed, but in this situation he (the original poster) wanted the flow to stay attached. Maybe his goals should be re-examined.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
A 1/6th scale model may indeed have a very different Cd than the full sized version.
I will look into this.

Below is an example of what I had in mind, not saying it is the best thing to do to obtain an aero-design. Just saying if adding on, maybe scaling down the template is better than nothing at all.

18 Gurney Bubble $35
Cushman Competition


Panoramio - Photo of Gurney bubble on a GT40


Reproduction GT40 for sale in California - SB100 *SOLD* - GT40s.com
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote