Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com - View Single Post

freebeard · 05-26-2013, 01:37 AM

I looked at some of the neighboring videos. Here's some interesting stuff:

http://www.youtube.com/user/yshsuzuka/videos
9 videos. Desktop/office-sized (1/7th-1/24th scale) moving belt wind tunnel. "Reynolds number is no problem." Since 1974.

http://wwwDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=gHFFZ1ru0Pk
Scale models submerged in water. It works about as well as desktop CFD software. Some obvious areas for improvement: The tunnel is too narrow and should be closed on top. Needs immiscible 'smoke' and a steerable nozzle.

I could see a tank divided in thirds with walls/baffles that have four wind/waterwheels, one at each end of both walls. Do you think it would minimize turbulence that way?

05-26-2013, 01:37 AM	#10 (permalink)
freebeard Master EcoModder Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: northwest of normal Posts: 27,711 Thanks: 7,778 Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts	I looked at some of the neighboring videos. Here's some interesting stuff: http://www.youtube.com/user/yshsuzuka/videos 9 videos. Desktop/office-sized (1/7th-1/24th scale) moving belt wind tunnel. "Reynolds number is no problem." Since 1974. http://wwwDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=gHFFZ1ru0Pk Scale models submerged in water. It works about as well as desktop CFD software. Some obvious areas for improvement: The tunnel is too narrow and should be closed on top. Needs immiscible 'smoke' and a steerable nozzle. I could see a tank divided in thirds with walls/baffles that have four wind/waterwheels, one at each end of both walls. Do you think it would minimize turbulence that way? Last edited by freebeard; 05-26-2013 at 03:30 AM..