View Single Post
Old 05-26-2013, 11:03 AM   #18 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Ummmm...
'84 Escort = .36 Cd (or .38- depends on source: 1983 -1985 Ford Escort GT Turbo: The Trickle Down Effect | Autopolis )
'12 Rustang = .36 Cd

No doubt the Escort enjoys a nice frontal area advantage too...
From your link:
Quote:
The boxy shape was aided by aero enhancements that included a chin spoiler and a large flat rear spoiler that assisted in the Escorts shape defying drag coefficient of .38
I have to agree that the old Escort enjoys a smaller frontal area advantage, no way else to explain the near matching Cd numbers with the new Mustang.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote