05-29-2013, 11:57 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
..........the Wolfgang Klemperer streamlined 'minivan' of 1922.
|
In my search to find images of this vehicle I found an intersting website.
Concept Cars and Aerodynamics, 1917-1940
by PETE on MAY 2, 2013
Concept Cars and Aerodynamics, 1917-1940
Still no signs of the Klemperer in question.
EDIT-1:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
*The 1/6-scale model would not have the same Cd as the full-scale car until 120- mph due to the Reynolds number effect with the boundary layer.
*The 'Template' can only be applied as is shown.It is absolutely contextual.The alignments must be at identical scale and position.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
*For canopies,blisters,tanks,radomes,nacelles,etc.,you should consult 'AERODYNAMIC DRAG',by Sighard Hoerner.It is the book(s) which is most listed as a reference for such specific information,including Hucho.
*When 'combination',or,'composite' body structures are pieced together,the interaction of each component can create 'super-velocity' effects upon adjoining components and their aerodynamic characteristics are altered by the interactions.
The 'Template' would in no way be appropriate for designing such structures.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're interested in only limited 'low drag',then there are many options.
The NASA Dryden van would be one.This design would be patterned after DOT vehicle length and other restrictions.It does not reflect an 'ideal' solution,just an arbitrarily optimized one.
|
Seems to me like there are very limited opportunities to apply the template to existing and typically flat sided (and rectangular wheel layout) automobiles.
I don't think that I'll even bother considering these limitations, as it will never be perfect. Anyone who does a template overlay must be a misguided fool and totally ignorant to boot, right?:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...c-9287-13.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
Here's something to consider.
*The lowest Cd for a streamline body of revolution in free-air is 0.04.
* The Template,in free-air,has Cd 0.04.
* When the Template is 'split' in ground-reflection it is Cd 0.07
* When the 'ground-clearance' is cut away from the 'half-body' the Cd is 0.08.
* When skinny wheels are added to it the Cd jumps to 0.12.
* When wheel fairings are arranged around the wheels/tires,the Cd drops to 0.089.
|
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...c-9287-47.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
If you're up for it, try the Squircle. That's the one in the middle here:
|
Is this the official Part-C aero-Template Cross Section?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squircle
I've always assumed the Part-C aero-template would look like this (see image below) in front view, but I'm still looking for it.
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/201...n-three-parts/
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects
2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft
You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
Last edited by kach22i; 05-29-2013 at 05:24 PM..
|
|
|