Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews
do you also believe that the oil companies squashed a carb that got 99mpg??????? ![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
|
No, I do not. I'm an engineer and I spend a fair amount of time reading my Hucho. I know the equations. It's all about environment, weight, frontal area, and Cd. It's Cd under discussion.
Quote:
Here is something to think about.
Some other german car maker w/ a big windtunnel (bmw maybe) has some engineer come in and say "mb is blowing smoke on the .23 cd......let's go buy one, run the test and then expose them!!" ![Thumbs up](/forum/images/smilies/grinning-smiley-003.gif)
2 days later MB is retracting and firing.
Loses MASSIVE credibility in the marketplace.........
just sayin......
|
Read your Hucho. There is enough wiggle room between different wind tunnels that such a test would probably prove nothing. Identical testing in the same wind tunnel would be the only convincing test IMO. But, admittedly I am speculating. I just don't see the stuff on the car that translates to .23 when the Insight is .25. Of course, that has not been independently tested either, far as I know
![Wink](/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)