View Single Post
Old 06-03-2013, 01:18 PM   #54 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,522
Thanks: 8,074
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
Quote:
This is curious, the "Estate Back" (think of a Chrysler 300 wagon) has a higher Cd than the "Fastback".
Dodge Magnum?

Quote:
rather than with a 1/5 scale model (whose aerodynamic results are generally about 20% better), but also whether the car was a real one, and loaded...it is much easier to achieve good aerodynamic results with a large vehicle than with a small one.

..........any takers?
It's just a poorly written article? But it is possible to use more relaxed curves on a larger vehicle and elements like doors and headlights don't scale.

Quote:
The spoiler improves the CxS by 2.7 %, the aerofoil by 7.5 %. Both together improve the CxS by 10 % and reduce petrol consumption by 7.5 % at 120 km/h (74.6 mph).
If they re using the spoiler and aerofoil together, what the odds the aerofoil is at the front, e.g., air dam/partial bellypan? "improve the CxS by 10 % and reduce petrol consumption by 7.5 %" might mean high rolling resistance. Or the Cd%/2=mpg% rule of thumb may assume a lower speed. 60mph vs 74mph might account for it.
  Reply With Quote