View Single Post
Old 06-05-2013, 11:39 AM   #6 (permalink)
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
Another reason P&G isn't ideal in automatics is the torque converter. What you want for P&G is high engine load, but low engine rpms. In an automatic, if you want high engine load you can't get low rpms, you get high rpms. High load also creates more heat in the torque converter and you loose some efficiency there too. When I drive an automatic I accelerate moderately fast while trying to keep engine rpms fairly low. You can learn to trick the car into shifting by letting off the gas a bit, waiting for it to shift, then reapplying as much as you can without downshifting too.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote