View Single Post
Old 06-16-2013, 07:17 PM   #33 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,480

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,218
Thanked 4,393 Times in 3,366 Posts
Both of these posts below imply an ambiguous fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 101Volts View Post
Off-topic a bit, But buying a new car will have more of an impact on the environment than using a beat up sedan from the 80s for 20,000 miles or so I read.
Positive or negative impact on the environment?

Besides environmental concerns, there are financial ones as well, among many others.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PressEnter[] View Post
It looks like Fuelly has gotten in the Mythbusters spirit...did anyone else see their current tip on the home page:

Tip: 50/50 rule--updated | Fuelly
Quote:
Although Mythbuster has "proven" that it is more efficient to have the windows up at 50 miles an hour and higher, likely their test was done with a car with belt driven A/C. This rule will not be true with newer cars that have electric A/C.
In what way will the rule be broken for cars with an electric A/C? Will it be more efficient to drive with the window open at higher or lower speeds than 50mph in this case?
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Flakbadger (06-16-2013)