View Single Post
Old 06-25-2013, 08:20 PM   #161 (permalink)
sendler
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
[QUOTE=3-Wheeler;377822]I don't see any inherent advantage of a bike with a high CG offering a reduction in lean angle.

QUOTE]

Raising the cg of a motorcycle/ rider reduces the lean angle that is needed for any given lateral acceleration by increasing the radius that the cg moves through as it leans. The higher cg is now displaced laterally more to the inside of the contact patch than the lower cg would be for the same angle.
.
Wide tires also corner less for any given angle because the mass is moving in as you lean but the contact patch is also following it to the inside as well so there is less net offset than with a narrower tire and wheel.

  Reply With Quote