I once had a tour round the Amer power plants in Geertruidenberg, the Netherlands. The biggest power plant in Holland at the time.
They were mainly using coal and a bit of natural gas.
Their 3-stage steam turbines and air-jet mattress burning bed (for near total combustion) made them close to 60% efficiënt measured from the caloric value of the coal to electricity delivered to the net; claiming a total efficiëncy of around 50% from coal to house applicances, including transport and conversion losses.
That was July 1982. If 50% was possible then how come there are still plants around that perform significantly less?
A greater demand will no doubt make it more profitable to build fuel efficient power plants.
The electric car would thereby help, not hurt, the environment.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26d2f/26d2fd383570960f5e2d4f81cd9de6e3e0be699f" alt="" lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d93/e4d937e38f08e38697c61d8658e4cebca14b8274" alt=""
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
|