View Single Post
Old 07-10-2013, 04:48 PM   #11 (permalink)
Julian Edgar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
As I keep trying to point out when I see VG Gimmicks discussed, Skin drag is not the enemy of fuel efficiency with vehicles, it is pressure/form drag that we must address.

By messing with air only an inch or so away from the skin of the car, air which is already decidedly non-laminar...meaning it is already vortexing...these devices accomplish nothing.

If you want to improve your cars aerodynamics, you need to make changes in the shape of the car, this will affect the pressure, hopefully reducing drag.

Buffeting the buffeted air 1" from the skin of a car which is creating effects on the air many feet out from the skin in every direction is like wondering why the flow of a 6 foot deep river isn't changed by more than a tiny fraction if there is a stony bottom or a smooth one.

When you look at VG's in the big picture, they're a joke. You will never gain a discernible change in fuel efficiency with VG's alone.
But vortex generators aren't about changing skin drag, are they? They're about energising the boundary layer to make the airflow better follow changes in shape and so, yes, reduce pressure drag.

  Reply With Quote