View Single Post
Old 07-20-2013, 02:24 PM   #12 (permalink)
Sven7
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
2) A car and driver test of different wheel sizes, showing acceleration, braking, and MPG: Effects of Upsized Wheels and Tires Tested - Tech Dept. - Car and Driver


That shows that the 14 pound difference between the wheel/tire packages- 15x6" and 19x8.5"- was 2.2mpg over their test, with the smaller wheels being better. The roadholding also drops 0.05g with the skinnier 195 tires compared to 235's.

Also note that the 2.2mpg improvement also equated to 0.2 seconds and 2mph quicker in the quarter mile. Braking 60-0 mph is 4 feet worse with the skinny tires.

The smaller wheels and tires have lower prices, lower weight, better mpg, better acceleration and marginally lower road noise.

_________________________________

Relative to this thread, I will say that if the cars are the same weight, whichever car has less rotational mass will be better for mpg in stop and go situations. Whether the difference is multiplied by 1.5 or 10, you're still going to benefit by reducing rotating mass.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store

Last edited by Sven7; 07-20-2013 at 02:31 PM..
  Reply With Quote