Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack
Lol, you only have to show your work, you havent, though you like to say you have. You cant be bothered to lay out your argument clearly. You continue to attack the messenger, just show your work already, you will need realistic efficiency maps for each loss and have to line up speed/rpm/volts and torque/amsp and whatnot at each operational point, not simply retrace an isobar and say "boy that was hard".
You are making the extra ordinary claim here, so pony up, It is not my job to prove or disprove it, or even believe it till it is proven. I have heard the speculation you have posed as evidence, but I would like to see you use actual data. But instead of doing that you will probably just continue to say you already did and nit pick over semantics.
Thing is I don't think you CAN prove my theory wrong, and as we iterate over the optimizations it will become more and more apparent. Show me you lining up the losses at every step and expose it to the light of day.
|
RED
Incorrect ... I have several times ... even tried to use different ways.
But ... before I do so again ... I want to know it won't be a waste of my time ... Sense I've been down this road already with you several times.
Showing 'the work' details ... makes for a long and more complicated post ... that is why I thought the summary of it shown with the red and blue on the BSFC was a far more concise and easy to grasp version.
So ... first confirm that it won't be another waste of my time ...
#1>
You will read through 100% of it.
#2> If there are any parts of it you do not understand ... I'm not psychic ...
you have the burden to explain what specific part you need additional explanation of... not general repeats of your opinion ... be specific.
#3> If you disagree with a piece of evidence itself , that I reference ... you will explain specifically why you disagree ... and give a counter reference ( of equal credibility ) to evidence supporting your disagreement ... your opinion of disagreement is inadequate to opposed referenced evidence... this applies to the evidence itself ... my use of any evidence I present falls under #2 above.
Agree/Confirm to that ... and I will try and walk you through it once again step by step, from the beginning.
If , you will not agree in advance , to do your part of it ... as I outlined above ... I'm not going to waste my time , again.
- - - - - -
Green
Incorrect.
I have not made extraordinary claims.
Perhaps you need to look up what it means for a claim to be ... an extraordinary claim ... that has not been any of my claims.
Several of your claims however ... have gone beyond extraordinary ... well into the absolute side of claims ... as was just recently explained to you ( see previous post ).
And , you've posted you just 'assume' this extraordinary is correct and true ... that is very bad methodology.