View Single Post
Old 07-27-2013, 06:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
oil pan 4
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by z3pilot99 View Post
I do understand the theory/reasoning of why a cai harms gas mileage. The thing that I question is the increase in mileage reported on the highway with this particular set up. This has been stated by many people that did this mod on the focus forum. I hesitate to call it ram air. So is there a confirmation a positive pressure in the airbox give a simular effect to a low pressure turbo, with possible mileage gains? Also, if I read the second post correctly it would be best to have a heated positive pressure in the airbox, right?
A ram air effect might give you a few inches of water worth of pressure, nothing like the effect you get from a turbo.
Put it this way, the positive pressure effect from ram air is slow low I have not been able to measure it.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote