Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack
It is Bullcrap to use an ambiguous phrase in the first place, then when I ask you a "YES OR NO" clarification question to sermon me on what I obviously already know from the provided context and the clarification request.
Don't be suprised if I ignore your posts when they start like this or refer to me in the third person.
|
Bold added.
I did not interpret your post #93 that way ... and I did not see the "YES OR NO" you quote here appearing in that Post #93 at all.
- - - - -
It was not a sermon ... I tried to give clarification , as you requested.
I don't see how it was obvious you understood , when you were asking me for clarification ??? ... If anything the request for clarification itself would seem to indicate that you did not understand something about the post of mine you referenced.
I was not aware the 3rd person part of speech so irritating for you ??? ... news to me , first I'm reading about it ... I'm also not clear about what part of my clarification post you are referring to ???
Where specifically is it that you were offended by my use of a 3rd person pronoun ?
- - - - - -
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Boy your really stepped in it there. I'm thinking Cool Planet tech with a hemp feedstock.
|
Seems like it ... although I honestly do not understand why ??? That is the evidence at hand about the net efficiencies of the paths ... oh well.
Cool link , by the way.