View Single Post
Old 08-05-2013, 08:37 AM   #11 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viturro View Post
So in your opinion, the aileron could have less lift and similar drag reduction?
I'm not the forum's local guru aerodynamicist (Aerohead is), just voicing my opinion.

On my own roof wing (see link in signature below), I've found that an air-slot flush with the roof plane will still draw air down into it, there need not be a "Ram Air" effect.

I recently posted an article about the new full sized GM Pick-Up truck, they slotted the side joint between the cab and bed which reduced drag from air being sucked into it. I think there is a correlation here.

In my opinion the aileron will have less lift than the Kamback.

Beware, less lift and more down force typically results in more drag. This rule of thumb of course has many exceptions. The clarifyer here would be how the sides of each section shown are actually treated.

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
Viturro (08-05-2013)