View Single Post
Old 08-09-2013, 01:03 PM   #21 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
From later research,it appears that there is a distinct advantage to cutting as much airflow off as possible to the underside. Even with a perfect belly pan.
Thank you for giving that scanned book image some context.

The said advantage of cutting airflow to the underside most likely applies to drag alone, and not complete vehicle dynamics of trying to keep a car planted at speed.

Air will get under there no matter what, and you have to manage it.

Air management of the underside beyond that of a smooth belly pan will bear this out with ground effects in mind.

I'm also guessing that reducing the amount of air under the vehicle and as tested did not include increasing the frontal area, otherwise the results would have been tainted and perhaps opposite of desired.

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote