Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
(...) I tried smoothing over the trough along the windshield at the 'A' pillar and it did absolutely nothing.
|
I've been looking over that Mercedes with its reputed Cw of 0.23 to look for details that are different, as from a distance it looks like nothing special is going on.
On of those details was that the A pillars have a protruding edge, as if the glass has sunk half an inch down.
Then there's the 2015 Jazz, which (as a hybrid) claims to get 80+ mpg. It has that same feature...
So (at least) 2 cars that get better FE than expected have
protruding A pillars, or 'deepened' front windows.
What then makes that so good?
You'd expect that it would be good to make the air roll smoothly over the A pillar. These designs, and the trough you covered, all make it less smooth, but they work.
In the Mercedes smoke test you can see the air still rolls over the A pillar, apparently the edge cannot prevent it completely. It makes a sharp radius and gets turbulent. It does not look particularly good, something you want to avoid.
The flow over the roof is very smooth indeed.
I think anything that can lead more air over the roof instead of curling over the A pillar would lower air resistance. Might even add a small ridge to the front of my A pillars one day...
When your mod doesn't do what you expected, it may just be pointing out another direction to follow.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
![](https://images.spritmonitor.de/544051_25.png)
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.
![](https://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig7127a.png)
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.