View Single Post
Old 08-16-2013, 12:35 AM   #6 (permalink)
t vago
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,766

The Karen-Mobile - '05 Dodge Magnum SXT
Team Dodge
90 day: 26.72 mpg (US)

Fiat Dakota - '00 Dodge Dakota SLT RWD Quad Cab
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)

The Red Sled - '01 Dodge Durango SLT 4WD
90 day: 16.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 799
Thanked 681 Times in 437 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickdigger View Post
I've also gotten my cpu load down to 3-5% on a 4x20 LCD, just by tweaking the LCD routines to meet the spec. The killer is delay2 (5 milliseconds) in LcdCommandWrite. It only needs to be 120 microsec. That should eliminate the need for that buffer you added.
I tried it just now, and the results were not very encouraging.

Buffered LCD code (approximately 1 ms per character):
CPU loading = 2.2%
Free Mem: 1044
Program Size: 20178

Bare LCD code (80 us per character):
CPU loading = 3.2%
Free Mem: 1172
Program Size: 20548

To be fair, the Bare LCD code did seem to be a bit more crisp in response, than the buffered code. However, it would not be that big of an advantage, compared to the fact that the code grew by 370 bytes, while only gaining 128 bytes of RAM. Ugh.
__________________
The Fiat Dakota


The Karen-mobile


The Red Sled
  Reply With Quote