View Single Post
Old 08-27-2013, 02:26 AM   #39 (permalink)
Xist
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,189

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,218 Times in 1,709 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Let's now consider a modern car as an example: the Peugeot 3008
[IMG]
It's available in some markets with a 1.6L turbodiesel fitted with idle-stop, and a hybrid version with a 2.0L turbodiesel providing FWD with the electric motor bolted to the rear axle. In this case, the hybrid version doesn't really provide such a great improvement in fuel savings, in spite of the 4WD being a nice feature. Then, we must consider the overall energy expense to manufacture and to perform the maintenance, the more intense mineral extraction (or eventually a higher demand for recycled materials which could be used for other purposes) and the disposal of the batteries.
Non-hybrid has a smaller engine than the hybrid, while both have turbos?! How does that make any sense?!

What size engine would you guys put in the hybrid?
  Reply With Quote