08-30-2013, 07:19 PM
|
#238 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
loss
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler
75% reduction wouldn't be correct. Maybe 75% remaining of the full length is what was meant.
.
I have heard that the penalty of a Kamm can be a 10% increase in cd with the truncation at 60% of the original length or the point where the width at the truncation is 1/2 the maximum width of the airfoil. This is the trade off I am building my tail with in order to keep the loss of garage space to a minimum and to have a flat area at the rear for the tail light and license plate. This will save me 30-40 inches of overall length.
|
please see permalink#235
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|