View Single Post
Old 09-01-2013, 06:09 PM   #9 (permalink)
arcosine
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,151

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 334 Times in 226 Posts
Im returning over 50 mpg in my saturn with a belly pan, its at 2000rpm at 65 mph and runs over 8psi vacuum on flat ground. 1.9L/3.1L*2000 = 1225 rpm equivelent displacement so it will have 10% more umf and 40% more weight than the saturn. Might be as slow accelerating as an unassisted Insight in lean burn. Id like to gear the saturn up more. Weight is 3600lb vs 2500lb. 120 hp is at only 4200 rpm, I doubt if my engine will make 120 hp, with hot air intake and all. What do CRX HFs run, 1.5L@1900 rpm at 65 mph, 2300 lbs. 3.1*1350/3600 = 1.16 1.5*1900/2300 = 1.2. So it will be struggling 4 % more than a CRX at highway speed. Definately willl need a belly pan and and full front and rear skirts, starting a CD = .30 is not too bad.. OK so 1350 may be a bit slow but not out of the relm. I could use a 3.06 final drive for 1440 RPM, but my wife likes to drive at 80 mph. 1350 would be fine for the 3.4 or 3.8 engines.
__________________
- Tony


Last edited by arcosine; 09-01-2013 at 06:55 PM..
  Reply With Quote