Your presumption never ceases to amaze altered
you would be a much happier person if you accept the world as it is instead of assuming it is wrong. I don't prefer human extinction, speaking of alarmism. But you seem to think that this one issue is the most important one, and indeed it has dominated the discussions and policy, there is always a bigger picture. Good? Bad? Those are moral judgements, dou think it is the role of science to assert morality? Haven't we been trying to do that with our belief systems as well with countless negative effects? (I.e. passing judgement on contraception and etc, and general conflict/manifest destiny mentality?) You are only taking the most cursory evaluation of the motivations here and only looking at part of the whole, judging who is good and bad in the process.