Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEnemy
Then how is that pier reviewed science, when they will not share their IP? How do they verify their results if the only ones they share those calculations with are others who believe the same way. Science should be open, open for review, open for scrutiny otherwise it is not Science.
|
The method and reasoning is described. That is sufficient to reproduce the method (and results).
It isn't necessary to view the code because anyone is free to do similar work, perhaps in a similar way, perhaps with a different approach. Because there
is a fundamental truth,
any valid method will approach it.
That multiple methods
do suggest that the climate is changing due to human activity is strong evidence for that to be so.
Virtually the same result can be found using different models. In the case of Pliocene climate, the model results also match what is found using physical evidence indicative of the climate during that period.