Quote:
Originally Posted by Ardent
20x4 display?  But seriously, I haven't been able to think of anything. |
20x4? Where's the puking smiley?
I can't even imagine the amount of code re-write needed to support a 20x4 screen at this point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ardent
EEPROM wouldn't need to be used would it?
|
It's either put the stored run pairs into EEPROM, or make the test run feature here conflict with the "x" vs. speed graphs on the AtMegaX28 processors, due to RAM space limitations. AtMega2560 and AtMega32U4 processors would be able to handle the increased RAM usage. More than one run pair was implied above, each run pair would require two trip slots, and each trip slot consumes 40 bytes of RAM as it stands. The "X" vs. speed graphs use a common 15 slots.