View Single Post
Old 11-09-2013, 01:58 PM   #93 (permalink)
BongoBennie
lead foot
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 110
Thanks: 2
Thanked 55 Times in 33 Posts
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
If you look at the 1ZZ-FE development paper for example, you'll see that connecting rod mass does affect fuel economy on the order of ~0.5% for a ~10% increase. For the ultimate eco engine, you could have a low rev limit like a Prius (4000rpm), extremely thin titanium (you can go titanium MMC if that cash is really burning a hole in your pocket) or maraging steel rods or something that weigh 1/2 of stock (might not be able to go this light because of stiffness problems), extremely delicate and light pistons, knife edged crank, extremely weak valve springs, titanium valves, reduced deck clearance, 14:1 compression ratio with 280 degree intake cams that have very low lift. That would be like the dream efficiency engine, given a well sorted combustion chamber and direct injection and other goodies. Oh, multipoint laser ignition as Mazda is developing would help a little too, but you can't buy that.
As tempting as it is to do a build like this, I'd am saving my big money for an electric build..... I have a K24 civic to build as well..... I need a damn sponsor

new accord 4banger is direct injected, looking into its possibilities as well, also that new Fiat car is cam less, very interesting as well.
__________________
2001 Insight 11.5:1 K20a3 turbo / 04 Element
  Reply With Quote