View Single Post
Old 11-11-2013, 05:30 PM   #2 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,914
Thanks: 24,000
Thanked 7,227 Times in 4,654 Posts
which

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big time View Post
Which one offers the best aero benefits when partially and when fully closed?
It might be the 'longitudinal' form which is best.Like Lockheed chose for the Pratt & Whitney engines of the SR-71,or hydro dams have for the turbine wheel jet nozzles.The Messerschmitt 262, Junkers Jumo 004 turbojets also used this 'bullet' valve in their tailpipe nozzle.
It's probably also why they're not used,do the the length available in a production vehicle.
I'm running this on the T-100.There's zero vena-contracta entry loss regardless of valve position,which cannot be said for any other type.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote