View Single Post
Old 11-18-2013, 04:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
bikenfool
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: lakewood, co, usa
Posts: 53

subey - '99 Subaru Impreza Outback Sport

rav4 - '07 Toyota Rav4
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Constant speed is less fuel-efficient than DWL because at a constant speed:

- More fuel is burned ascending.
Sure, but let say you slow down your constant speed target just a little bit, so the time to destination is the same with either method. Then you will use more on the climb, but use less the rest of the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
- While descending, the energy invested in the climb is then "wasted" through increased engine braking.
If the hill is steep enuf you can coast. If it is not steep enuf to coast you will waste more energy by increasing your speed due to due to aero drag, velocity squared.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
One thing to keep in mind is that while target driving, you are typically exceeding the average (constant) speed by the bottom of the descent while still maintaining the target consumption.

  Reply With Quote