View Single Post
Old 11-26-2013, 02:03 PM   #71 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Are we talking about vans or pickups?

A FWD pickup would just plain suck, if it is to be used as a working vehicle, for example on a farm much of the time off road.

A FWD van or mini-van is a different animal, more likely to be on pavement and more likely to not be as heavily loaded and besides, even with a good load they are still front heavy i.e. the weight is over the drive wheels. The people have voted and FWD mini-vans are O.K.

Speaking of giant FWD vans, what could be gianter than the GMC Motorcoach? I drove one this summer- very nice going down the road but very poor drive traction in less than optimal conditions.



The big GMC could be re-engineered for more weight over the front end though, as could most any van.

__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 11-26-2013 at 02:23 PM..
  Reply With Quote