View Single Post
Old 12-11-2013, 07:28 PM   #190 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,176
Thanks: 125
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
In 1969,a GM Pontiac GTO "Judge" was road tested in the Nevada desert.
At 115-mph,the car,without the rear spoiler,generated 105-lbs front lift,and 250-lbs rear lift.
Those testing the car felt that due to the car's weight,none of this lift was an issue for stability.
The prevailing thinking of those times in America also suggested that larger/heavier cars cornered better because the weight kept them planted on the road. This classic thinking is alive and well even today, but that don't make it right - not in the slightest.

Just about everything I've done to my pick-up truck has been to get more down-force without sacrificing mpg's, and that has been my choice.

Anyone thinking it's safe to go 115 mph in a 2-ton muscle car has brass balls and perhaps got a hold of some good recreational drugs in 1969.

I'd do 110 mph on a motorcycle, or 140 mph in an old Porsche 911 before I'd do 115 mph in a 1969 GTO.

A friend of mine had a 1969 GTO back in 1979, pretty thrilling doing 60 mph on a side street, that thrill would soon turn to terror at truly high speeds I'm afraid.

115 mph at driver's discretion to say the very least.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-12-2014)