View Single Post
Old 12-20-2013, 10:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,852

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,335
Thanked 4,490 Times in 3,453 Posts
This topic has been hotly debated in several threads.

As already pointed out, a generator is not as efficient as a pusher due the mechanical -> electrical -> mechanical conversion. A pusher generates mechanical energy and applies it directly to propelling the vehicle.

The advantages I see of using a generator:

1. Backup home power in the event of outages
2. Generator does not push the vehicle and introduce dangerous driving dynamics
3. Generator can be sized for the average load and run at a constant speed, utilizing battery power for acceleration and hills

Either way, a generator or pusher is impractical since most families have multiple vehicles, one of which could contain an ICE. Furthermore, the cost of a pusher or generator exceeds the cost of a normal used car. There just isn't a point to either a generator or pusher, since better alternatives for distance travel already exist.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 12-21-2013 at 03:27 AM..
  Reply With Quote