View Single Post
Old 01-06-2014, 06:43 PM   #100 (permalink)
CFECO
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
A neighbor had a 2-cyl VW aircraft conversion we were considering for a model to do a 2-banger to share between his Bug and my Ghia.
He died,and that was the end of that.
In the intervening years I've come to believe that the reserve power of the original engine is an important safety factor,as some emergencies require judicious use of horsepower when braking won't save you from the situation (as with motorcycles).
Passing and hill climbing will suffer immediately,and any acceleration will require longer residence time in transitory engine operation which is the least efficient in BSFC.
My 60-bhp CRX already has head-wind issues on flat highways,requiring downshifts to a higher friction lower gear.
Taking a more massive vehicle of greater frontal area to a lower hp than that of the Honda might be a recipe for disappointment.
I think you'd regret the change.
And there are dozens and dozens of vehicles which without any mods,would deliver like safety,comfort,etc.,and with higher efficiency.
True, that is why my original X-Prize car had two, two cylinder outboard powerheads, which would run together or one only depending on load requirements. Think of a gas golf cart, the engine doesn't run until power is required, when you step on the throttle. Mine was to be; Electric to start driving initially, with one or both ICE power plants starting as the throttle was pushed farther down. If the car "Only Needs" 15HP to go 60 MPH, it can be done with a 15HP engine, passing or hills, the HP doubles or more. Harder, in some ways and not as efficient, as making one engine convert from 2 to 4 cylinders.
  Reply With Quote