View Single Post
Old 01-06-2014, 07:38 PM   #87 (permalink)
drrbc
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 80
Thanks: 24
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
1) The energy *cost* of creating H2 -- ie: % = P.out/P.in -- because it takes MORE energy to disassociate H20 into H2 and O2 than you gain, consuming MORE gasoline in the process of generating the DC-current used in the process.
Nope. Specious and non sequitur. It is not a closed system.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
2) The energy *cost* of creating H2, ie: gasoline is FAR less costly than H2.
Interestingly (IIRC, I may be able to dig up the article) in the 1970's NASA took and old station wagon and basically hooked a cat cracking unit to the intake. Passed the vaporized gas over hot rocks reducing the long chains to short and increasing the amount of H2. They proved their point (pollution control I think). This way you can have gasoline and make H2 at the same time.
  Reply With Quote