Quote:
Originally Posted by DonEaston
Sorry for the confusion, Mr. Firstlaw- not trolling at all.
I don't have too much experience with sub-compacts, but my father in law is an enthusiast of Geo and Kia, and when I drove them, I felt like I really had to push the things to get them to do what I wanted.
So, not "underpowered" in the sense of "my vehicle is more powerful than yours", simply in the sense of "is it really economical to try to push a (relatively) heavy vehicle with the smallest engine possible? Would not make more sense to give a very light vehicle an engine that could essentially 'idle' down the road?"
For example, I know a guy who put a large V6 on a small tricycle type frame, and the unit itself got extremely high mileage. I do not recall the numbers, but I remember wondering if perhaps the unit would not have gotten such good mileage had the engineer chosen a smaller engine.
Okay, all for now.
Pat
|
I always wanted to know the same thing. Like my pickup truck with a 5.7 Hemi gets 16-28 But if you were to put a smaller engine in it would it get worst mpg. They offer it in a 6 cylinder and its is suppost geting worst gas millage. But they say thats because the hemi has mds.